Making Sense Out of Information Overload
![]() |
| via penguinrandomhouse.ca |
Recently, I read a fascinating book called The Organized Mind by Daniel J. Levitin.
Levitin is the Professor Emeritus of Neuroscience and Music at McGill
University. He holds several degrees, has taught at various prestigious North
American universities, and is the author of bestselling books such as This Is Your Brain on Music and Weaponized Lies.
![]() |
| via daniellevitin.com |
In The Organized Mind,
Levitin focuses on how our mind operates when it comes to processing information. He looks at various areas of our lives, how we are hard-wired in those
areas, and what we can do to overcome some of our mental and behavioural tendencies in order to lead
more productive and organized lives.
With respect to the interactive media industry, he raises several interesting points that are relevant to anyone working in the industry.
The Tablet and Chisel
![]() |
| via Pixabay.com |
There is a preconception that if you’re into technology, you
have no use for writing things down on paper. But Levitin dispels that myth. In
chapter 2, he describes how Sheryl Sandberg of Facebook revealed that she
carries around a pen and notebook to keep track of her To Do list. She’s quoted
as saying that around her office, it’s like “carrying around a stone tablet and
chisel.”
Levitin, however, argues that downloading information onto
index cards or into notebooks helps to clear the mind of information overload.
Being able to organize thoughts through physical methods, which removes the pressure
to recall, also leads to better brainstorming which is exactly the same
principle behind card sorting and other UX design strategies.
The Multitasking Myth
![]() |
| via Pixabay.com |
If I had a dollar for every time I saw a job posting that
mentioned “multitasking” as a necessary skill, I would probably be living on
my own private island, enjoying the good life. Apparently, every job requires
multitasking.
But in chapter 3, Levitin notes that we’re not really
good at multitasking. If anything, we’re moving from one task to another
rather than doing multiple tasks simultaneously. And, he says there’s a physical and mental cost to doing
that. Research has shown that multitasking can increase the creation of stress
hormones and adrenaline which causes us to lose focus. We also possess a
novelty bias that encourages us to gravitate to something new. This means we’re
too easily distracted for our own good. The research says that these “multitasking”
distractions cause poor “cognitive performance,” meaning we lose IQ points when
we multitask. Yikes!
In the interactive media industry, there is an expectation
to be connected, to be responsive. But as Levitin argues, we need to have time
to “disconnect,” to relax and focus on one task. We’ll be more productive and the
quality of work will be better if we stop trying to multitask all the time.
That’s why more and more companies are offering benefits that foster a
better work-life balance. They want employees to step away from
their desks in order to be more productive overall. Being overworked leads to more errors, so doing less multitasking
will actually save time in the long-run because we won’t be spending extra time
trying to fix our mistakes.
Tribal Thinking
![]() |
| via Pixabay.com |
Levitin also had some interesting insights on our social
biases. Over the last few years, the focus for many industries, not just
interactive media, has been on increasing diversity in the workplace. This is an
important goal because employing people from different backgrounds
encourages greater empathy towards all people. And, from a business perspective, it makes sense that you want to have input from a variety of people in order to create a product that attracts as wide an audience as possible.
According to Levitin, in chapter
4, our “in-group/out-group” bias causes us to view our own group as diverse,
while other groups are seen as homogenous. In a workplace culture that doesn't recognize the need to focus on creating diversity, the group bias will only exacerbate the situation. For example, when a hiring manager interviews candidates for a job,
the group bias could affect the manager's view of those candidates. People who identify with the same group as the manager could appear more qualified because they're being assessed on their individual achievements. Meanwhile candidates from an
outside group may be judged based on what the manager’s impressions of that whole group are. This will likely lead to the hiring manager offering the job to someone that's like them.
We tend to rely on stereotypes when we judge other groups which greatly affects our ability to create new and meaningful relationships with people who are different from us. And without varied relationships, there is little hope of us understanding people from different walks of life and incorporating this knowledge in the work that we do.
We tend to rely on stereotypes when we judge other groups which greatly affects our ability to create new and meaningful relationships with people who are different from us. And without varied relationships, there is little hope of us understanding people from different walks of life and incorporating this knowledge in the work that we do.





Comments
Post a Comment